Arguing Against Civil Society

Arguing Against Civil Society

Tuesday, April 10, 2007 – 12:47

In his article published in The Guardian, Jeremy Seabrook opposes the accepted argument that advocates for the establishment of a vibrant civil society as a prerequisite for development.

In his article published in The Guardian, Jeremy Seabrook opposes the accepted argument that advocates for the establishment of a vibrant civil society as a prerequisite for development. He makes the point that the expansion of a civil society creates an agreeable impression of diversity and democratic pluralism; but is designed to ensure that nothing challenges the destructive system of which civil society is both ornament and agent of control.

To read his article, click here.  

Add Comments

Login or register to post comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top